|
FRANKLIN
HIGH SCHOOL GENERAL COMPOSITION RUBRIC
|
DISTINGUISHED
|
PROFICIENT
|
|
·
Establishes a purpose with clear, focused
thesis
·
Depth of development evidenced through
strong use of research-based support, analysis, reflection and insight
·
Careful and/or subtle organization exists
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Effect of paper is enhanced through the
use of varied sentence structures (compound, compound-complex, etc.)
·
Precise, rich, and appropriate language is
evidenced
·
Mastery of spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization
|
·
Establishes a purpose with clear, focused
thesis
·
Depth of development evidenced through use
of research-based support, analysis, reflection, and insight
·
Logical, coherent organization exists
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Effect of paper is satisfied through
controlled and varied sentence structures
·
Acceptable, appropriate language is
evidenced
·
Few errors in spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization do not impede readability of paper
|
|
APPRENTICE
|
NOVICE
|
|
·
Contains a thesis statement that is
somewhat developed
·
Depth of development not clearly evidenced
through support-based research
·
Lapses in organization and/or coherence
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Simplistic and/or awkward sentence structures
·
Simplistic and/or imprecise language used
·
Several errors in spelling, punctuation,
and capitalization somewhat impede the readability of the paper
|
·
Lack of thesis or thesis unidentifiable
·
Depth of development minimal
·
Random and/or weak organization
·
Effect of paper is somewhat detracted by
incorrect, ineffective, and/or incomplete sentence structure
·
Incorrect and/or ineffective language is
evidenced
·
Abundant errors in spelling, punctuation,
and capitalization impede the readability of the paper
|
|
CRITERIA
|
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
|
|
|
|
|
PURPOSE/AUDIENCE
|
The degree to
which the writer provides thoughtful, detailed support to develop main ideas:
--establishes
and maintains a purpose, communicates with the audience, employs a
suitable voice
and/or tone
|
|
IDEA
DEVELOPMENT/
SUPPORT
|
The degree to
which the writer provides thoughtful, detailed support to develop main
idea:
--uses
supported-based research, integrates citations, analyzes citations and/or
excerpts (if
appropriate)
|
|
ORGANIZATION
|
The degree to
which the writer demonstrates:
--topic
sentences, logical order, coherence, unity, transitions/organizational
signals
|
|
SENTENCES
|
The degree to
which the writer includes sentences that are:
--varied in
structure, length, and presentation; grammatically complete and correct
|
|
LANGUAGE
|
The degree to
which the writer exhibits correct and effective:
--word choice,
usage
|
|
CORRECTNESS
|
The degree to
which the writer demonstrates correct
--spelling,
punctuation, and capitalization
|
Adapted from the
Kentucky
Writing Assessment
Holistic Scoring Guide
Proficiency
Rating: Distinguished Proficient Apprentice Novice
100
– 90 89 – 80 79 – 70 69 – 0
Point Total: __________ / 100 Comments:
|
|
Return to
Top |
|
FRANKLIN
HIGH SCHOOL LITERARY RUBRIC
|
DISTINGUISHED
|
PROFICIENT
|
|
·
Mastery of MLA format
·
Establishes a purpose with clear, focused
thesis
·
Depth of development evidenced through
strong use of research-based support, analysis, reflection and insight
·
Careful and/or subtle organization exists
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Effect of paper is enhanced through the
use of varied sentence structures (compound, compound-complex, etc.)
·
Precise, rich, and appropriate language is
evidenced
·
Mastery of spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization
|
·
Mastery of MLA format
·
Establishes a purpose with clear, focused
thesis
·
Depth of development evidenced through use
of research-based support, analysis, reflection, and insight
·
Logical, coherent organization exists
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Effect of paper is satisfied through
controlled and varied sentence structures
·
Acceptable, appropriate language is
evidenced
·
Few errors in spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization do not impede readability of paper
|
|
APPRENTICE
|
NOVICE
|
|
·
Mastery of MLA format
·
Contains a thesis statement that is
somewhat developed
·
Depth of development not clearly evidenced
through support-based research
·
Lapses in organization and/or coherence
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Simplistic and/or awkward sentence
structures
·
Simplistic and/or imprecise language used
·
Several errors in spelling, punctuation,
and capitalization somewhat impede the readability of the paper
|
·
Mastery of MLA format
·
Lack of thesis or thesis unidentifiable
·
Depth of development minimal
·
Random and/or weak organization
·
Effect of paper is somewhat detracted by
incorrect, ineffective, and/or incomplete sentence structure
·
Incorrect and/or ineffective language is
evidenced
·
Abundant errors in spelling, punctuation,
and capitalization impede the readability of the paper
|
|
CRITERIA
|
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
|
|
MLA FORMAT
|
The degree to
which the writer adheres to proper format regarding:
--margins,
heading and headers, spacing, font, parenthetical citations (crediting
sources), works
cited page; length meets teacher requirements
|
|
PURPOSE/AUDIENCE
|
The degree to
which the writer provides thoughtful, detailed support to develop main ideas:
--establishes
and maintains a purpose, communicates with the audience, employs a
suitable voice
and/or tone
|
|
IDEA
DEVELOPMENT/
SUPPORT
|
The degree to
which the writer provides thoughtful, detailed support to develop main
idea:
--uses
supported-based research, integrates citations, analyzes citations and/or
excerpts ACCURATELY
|
|
ORGANIZATION
|
The degree to which
the writer demonstrates:
--topic
sentences, logical order, coherence, unity, transitions/organizational
signals
|
|
SENTENCES
|
The degree to
which the writer includes sentences that are:
--varied in
structure, length, and presentation; grammatically complete and correct
|
|
LANGUAGE
|
The degree to
which the writer exhibits correct and effective:
--word choice,
usage
|
|
CORRECTNESS
|
The degree to
which the writer demonstrates correct
--spelling,
punctuation, and capitalization
|
Adapted from the
Kentucky
Writing Assessment
Holistic Scoring Guide
Proficiency
Rating: Distinguished Proficient Apprentice Novice
100
– 90 89 – 80 79 – 70 69 – 0
Point Total: __________ / 100 Comments:
|
|
Return to
Top |
|
FRANKLIN
HIGH SCHOOL RUBRIC:
Narrative/Epiphany
|
DISTINGUISHED
|
PROFICIENT
|
|
·
Establishes an epiphany with strong
support
·
Depth of development evidenced through
strong use of concepts of storytelling
·
Careful and/or subtle organization exists
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Effect of paper is enhanced through the
use of varied sentence structures (compound, compound-complex, etc.)
·
Precise, rich, and appropriate language is
evidenced
·
Mastery of spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization
|
·
Establishes an epiphany with strong
support
·
Depth of development evidenced through good
use of concepts of storytelling
·
Logical, coherent organization exists
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Effect of paper is satisfied through
controlled and varied sentence structures
·
Acceptable, appropriate language is
evidenced
·
Few errors in spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization do not impede readability of paper
|
|
APPRENTICE
|
NOVICE
|
|
·
Establishes an epiphany that is somewhat
supported (additional development is necessary)
·
Dpth
of development not clearly evidenced through concepts of storytelling
·
Lapses in organization and/or coherence
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Simplistic and/or awkward sentence
structures
·
Simplistic and/or imprecise language used
·
Several errors in spelling, punctuation,
and capitalization somewhat impede the readability of the paper
|
·
Lacks an epiphany
·
Depth of development minimal
·
Random and/or weak organization
·
Effect of paper is somewhat detracted by
incorrect, ineffective, and/or incomplete sentence structure
·
Incorrect and/or ineffective language is
evidenced
·
Abundant errors in spelling, punctuation,
and capitalization impede the readability of the paper
|
|
CRITERIA
|
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
|
|
|
|
|
PURPOSE/AUDIENCE
|
The degree to
which the writer provides thoughtful, detailed support to develop an
epiphany:
--establishes strong
setting, characterization, and coherence that result in an effective
narrative; strong epiphany at end of story
|
|
IDEA
DEVELOPMENT/
SUPPORT
|
The degree to
which the writer provides thoughtful, detailed support to develop main
idea:
--strong plot defined by details contribute to the
work as a whole
|
|
ORGANIZATION
|
The degree to
which the writer demonstrates:
--topic
sentences, logical order, coherence, unity, transitions/organizational
signals
|
|
SENTENCES
|
The degree to
which the writer includes sentences that are:
--varied in
structure, length, and presentation; grammatically complete and correct
|
|
LANGUAGE
|
The degree to
which the writer exhibits correct and effective:
use of strong
adjectives, adverbs, and verbs
|
|
CORRECTNESS
|
The degree to
which the writer demonstrates correct
--spelling,
punctuation, and capitalization
|
Adapted from the
Kentucky
Writing Assessment Holistic Scoring
Guide
Proficiency
Rating: Distinguished Proficient Apprentice Novice
100
– 90 89 – 80 79 – 70 69 – 0
Point Total: __________ / 100 Comments:
|
|
Return to
Top |
FRANKLIN
HIGH SCHOOL RESEARCH RUBRIC
|
DISTINGUISHED
|
PROFICIENT
|
|
·
Mastery of MLA format
·
Establishes a purpose with clear, focused
thesis
·
Depth of development evidenced through
strong use of research-based support, analysis, reflection and insight
·
Careful and/or subtle organization exists
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Effect of paper is enhanced through the
use of varied sentence structures (compound, compound-complex, etc.)
·
Precise, rich, and appropriate language is
evidenced
·
Mastery of spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization
|
·
Mastery of MLA format
·
Establishes a purpose with clear, focused
thesis
·
Depth of development evidenced through use
of research-based support, analysis, reflection, and insight
·
Logical, coherent organization exists
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Effect of paper is satisfied through
controlled and varied sentence structures
·
Acceptable, appropriate language is
evidenced
·
Few errors in spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization do not impede readability of paper
|
|
APPRENTICE
|
NOVICE
|
|
·
Mastery of MLA format
·
Contains a thesis statement that is
somewhat developed
·
Depth of development not clearly evidenced
through support-based research
·
Lapses in organization and/or coherence
within paragraphs and paper as a whole
·
Simplistic and/or awkward sentence
structures
| |